Why deforestation has become a business issue
Deforestation is one of the leading contributors to biodiversity loss, ecosystem degradation and greenhouse gas emissions. Agricultural expansion, timber production and commodity cultivation continue to drive forest conversion across many regions, creating environmental, social and economic risks that reach well beyond the areas directly affected.
For businesses, these risks increasingly show up as supply-chain disruption, regulatory exposure, reputational concern and growing stakeholder scrutiny. Consumers, investors and policymakers are placing more weight on responsible sourcing, and sustainability reporting frameworks increasingly expect organisations to understand environmental impacts right across their value chains.
Governments have responded by moving beyond voluntary commitments towards mandatory due diligence. One of the most significant developments on this front is the EUDR, which sets new obligations for organisations sourcing and trading products linked to forest-risk commodities. Rather than relying on environmental commitments alone, the regulation requires businesses to demonstrate that products entering or leaving the EU market have not contributed to deforestation or forest degradation.
What is the EUDR?
The EUDR is designed to reduce the EU's contribution to global deforestation by restricting the placement of products linked to recent deforestation or forest degradation on the European market.
Under the regulation, organisations placing relevant commodities or derived products on the EU market, or exporting them from the EU, must demonstrate that these products are:
-
Deforestation-free
-
Produced in accordance with the laws of the country of origin
-
Supported by an appropriate due diligence process
The regulation shifts responsibility from governments to businesses, requiring organisations to understand where their products originate, assess supply-chain risk and keep evidence to demonstrate compliance. Unlike previous sustainability initiatives that leant heavily on voluntary certification, the EUDR introduces mandatory legal obligations backed by due diligence requirements.
Where the timeline actually stands
The EUDR's application date has moved twice since the regulation was first adopted, and it is worth being precise about where things stand now rather than working from the original schedule.
Large and medium-sized operators and traders must now comply from 30 December 2026. Micro and small enterprises have until 30 June 2027. Both dates reflect a further twelve-month postponement announced in late 2025, on top of the one-year delay agreed in 2024, so this is the second time the deadline has moved. As things stand today, that gives most affected organisations a few months of preparation time still on the clock before the large and medium company deadline lands.
Alongside the postponement, the European Commission published a formal simplification review of the regulation on 3 May 2026. The Commission's own estimate is that these simplification measures should cut annual compliance costs for companies subject to EUDR obligations by around 75% compared with the original regulation, largely through a country risk classification system that allows lighter due diligence for lower-risk sourcing (more on this below).
Two postponements and a substantial simplification review are a reasonable signal that the practical shape of compliance is still settling. Worth checking for updates periodically as the December 2026 deadline approaches, rather than assuming today's detail is the final word.
Which commodities are covered?
The EUDR applies to several commodities identified as major drivers of global deforestation, along with a wide range of products derived from them. These include:
-
Cattle
-
Cocoa
-
Coffee
-
Palm oil
-
Rubber
-
Soy
-
Wood
The regulation also covers numerous derived products, such as furniture, leather goods, paper products, chocolate, coffee products and various processed food items, depending on classification.
For FMCG and retail businesses, this means a lot of commonly sourced ingredients, raw materials and consumer products can fall within scope. Because many products contain multiple commodities sourced from different regions, organisations often need visibility across several tiers of their supply chain to be confident of their position.
Who is affected?
Although the regulation is European, its reach extends well beyond organisations headquartered in the EU. The EUDR applies to operators and traders that place relevant products on the EU market or export them from the EU. This includes many:
-
FMCG manufacturers
-
Food and beverage companies
-
Retailers
-
Importers
-
Brand owners
-
Commodity traders
-
Private-label suppliers
Non-EU organisations supplying products into European markets can be affected indirectly too, as their EU customers increasingly need evidence to support their own regulatory compliance. As a result, organisations right across global supply chains are likely to keep seeing more requests for sourcing information, geolocation data and supplier documentation, regardless of where they themselves are based.
Why the EUDR is different from previous sourcing initiatives
Many organisations already run responsible sourcing programmes built around supplier codes of conduct or sustainability certifications. These remain valuable, but the EUDR introduces a considerably more rigorous regulatory approach.
The regulation requires organisations to demonstrate compliance through documented due diligence rather than relying solely on supplier declarations or voluntary certification schemes. Businesses need to be able to show where products originated, assess deforestation risk and hold onto evidence supporting their conclusions. That puts far more weight on supply-chain transparency, traceability and governance than most previous responsible sourcing programmes required.
A lighter path for lower-risk sourcing
One of the more useful outcomes of the 2026 simplification review is a country risk classification system that sorts sourcing countries and regions into low, standard or high risk. Where an organisation sources exclusively from countries classified as low risk, it can use simplified due diligence under Article 13 of the regulation.
This does not remove the obligation entirely. Operators still need to collect the required sourcing information and submit a due diligence statement, or in some cases a simplified declaration, through the EU's TRACES information system. But the depth of assessment required is considerably lighter than for standard or high-risk sourcing. Micro and small primary operators sourcing from low-risk countries have it easier still: many can file a single simplified declaration covering their sourcing, rather than a full due diligence statement for each placement on the market.
For FMCG and retail businesses sourcing from a mix of regions, this makes country-by-country risk classification worth checking early. It can meaningfully change how much due diligence work a given supply chain actually requires.
Building EUDR readiness
Preparing for the EUDR takes more than reviewing procurement policy. Organisations increasingly need structured governance processes capable of supporting ongoing due diligence across complex supply chains. Several practical priorities tend to come up again and again.
Understand product scope
Start by identifying whether the products or commodities your organisation handles fall within the regulation. Many businesses are running product-level reviews to work out which commodities are covered, where they are sourced, which suppliers are involved and which business units are affected. Getting this scope clear early helps prioritise everything that follows.
Map the supply chain
Supply-chain mapping has become one of the most important parts of EUDR preparation. Organisations need visibility beyond direct suppliers, right through to where commodities actually originate and how they move through processing and distribution networks. For a lot of FMCG businesses, that means tracing multiple sourcing regions, intermediaries and processing facilities before products even reach manufacturing. This exercise tends to surface data gaps that need further supplier engagement to close.
Strengthen supplier engagement
Supplier relationships matter more than ever under the EUDR. Many organisations are working with suppliers to obtain commodity origin information, farm or production site details, geolocation data, legal compliance documentation, traceability records and sustainability certifications where relevant. Rather than treating this purely as a procurement task, it is worth treating supplier collaboration as an ongoing relationship that supports broader supply-chain resilience, not a one-off compliance exercise.
Develop due diligence processes
The regulation requires structured due diligence procedures covering information gathering, risk assessment, risk mitigation, and documentation and record keeping. This usually needs collaboration across procurement, legal, sustainability, compliance and operations teams. Where sourcing is confirmed as low risk under the country classification system, some of this process can be considerably lighter, so it is worth mapping which of your supply chains might qualify before building out a full due diligence process for everything. Many organisations are integrating EUDR requirements into existing supplier risk management and ESG governance frameworks to improve efficiency rather than running it as a separate system.
Common implementation challenges
Although the regulation sets out clear expectations, implementation brings a few recurring practical challenges.
Limited supply-chain visibility. Many businesses lack visibility beyond Tier 1 suppliers. Understanding where commodities were actually grown or harvested often needs considerably deeper supply-chain engagement than organisations have historically maintained.
Data availability. Getting reliable supplier information can be difficult, particularly where commodities come from fragmented agricultural supply chains involving large numbers of small producers. Incomplete or inconsistent supplier data remains one of the biggest barriers to compliance.
Cross-functional coordination. EUDR compliance reaches well beyond the sustainability team. Procurement, legal, compliance, operations, logistics and IT functions often need to work together to build effective governance processes and data systems. Organisations without integrated governance structures tend to find implementation considerably more resource-intensive.
Managing multiple regulatory requirements at once. Many FMCG and retail organisations are preparing for several ESG regulations simultaneously, including the CSRD, CSDDD and evolving packaging, climate and human rights requirements. Balancing these overlapping obligations takes careful prioritisation and genuinely integrated compliance planning rather than treating each one in isolation.
Looking beyond compliance
Although the EUDR introduces new regulatory obligations, it also gives organisations a real opportunity to strengthen supply-chain governance and improve sourcing transparency. Enhanced traceability can support better supplier relationships, improved supply-chain risk management, stronger ESG reporting, greater customer confidence and better operational resilience.
Many organisations are finding that the investments made for EUDR readiness also strengthen their broader sustainability programmes, largely by improving supply-chain data quality and governance more generally. In the longer term, these capabilities are likely to support compliance with other environmental and human rights legislation too.
Preparing for a more transparent supply chain
The EUDR represents a significant shift in how organisations manage environmental risk across global supply chains. Rather than relying primarily on voluntary commitments, businesses are now expected to demonstrate, through structured due diligence, that relevant products entering or leaving the EU market are deforestation-free and legally produced. That expectation has held steady even as the regulation's own timeline and technical detail have shifted twice since it was first announced.
For FMCG and retail organisations, readiness goes beyond regulatory compliance. It calls for greater visibility into sourcing practices, stronger supplier relationships and more robust governance over the environmental risks embedded in supply chains. With large and medium companies now required to comply from 30 December 2026, and the country risk classification system offering a genuinely lighter path for lower-risk sourcing, the practical task now is to work out where your own supply chain sits and prepare accordingly, rather than treating the regulation as a single fixed set of requirements.
As sustainability regulation continues to evolve, organisations that invest early in traceability, supplier engagement and due diligence capabilities are likely to be better placed, not just to meet EUDR requirements, but to build more resilient, transparent and responsible supply chains generally.